Thanks Dridi and Guillaume for clarification!

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023, 18:30 Guillaume Quintard <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Adding to what Dridi said, and just to be clear: the "cleaning" of those
> well-known headers only occurs when the req object is copied into a beteq,
> so there's nothing preventing you from stashing the "cache-control" header
> into "x-cache-control" during vcl_recv, and then copying it back to
> "cache-control" during vcl_backend_response.
>
_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

Reply via email to