Thus spake "Todd Dunnavant": > Apologies in advance for my ignorance regarding the numbering scheme for > VASSAL version numbers! > > I assume that, once we achieve bug-fix version 2.9.9, the next bug-fix will > be 2.9.10, then 2.9.11, etc., rather than rev the first number and go to > 3.0.0? Whole-number changes normally are reserved for major releases of a > product, while first-decimal-digit revs are reserved for versions with new > features that aren't substantial enough to justify a major rev number > change. Numbers to the right of the second (and sometimes third) decimal > often are used for bug fixes, and can be larger than "9". Is this how we > assign version numbers to VASSAL releases, or is there another scheme? > > > Todd Dunnavant > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was assuming that we'd have 2.9.10 after 2.9.9. -- J.
