Jakob Simon-Gaarde wrote: > First of all I haven't just been talking, I have really spend days debugging > and profiling - so I think that should be respected in this context. I just > had to face the fact that I wasn't able to fix the problem.
Sorry if you viewed my answer disrespectful. It was not my intention. Any contribution is appreciated, and while your findings are currently a bit hard to explain, they are useful. But asking developers to react directly on even a small proportion of the mailing list mails would effectly shut down VirtualBox development. Which neither of us wants. So I've asked for a little patience, not more. > The hack mentioned was not ment as a solution but as information - it was > something I used for manual profiling which turned out to have the curious > effect of speeding up performance. So we both agree on the status of the hack. Have you tried the latest SVN code? As I said it may improve network performance in general (and NAT too). So feedback on that would be most welcome. Klaus _______________________________________________ vbox-dev mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
