Does anyone have any clues on the amount of effort to implement the new graphics cards.
>From the spice dev list their comment on integrating spice into vbox: "The spice server is design to be easily used by 3rd party. You need to expose vd_interfaces in the hypervisors side (see http://www.spice-space.org/docs/vd_interfaces.pdf) and libspice will plug into those interfaces. QXL (the GPU) is relay simple and can also be added to other hypervisors and so benefit from having a common driver. And last thing the hypervisor need to be under GPL licance in order to use libspice legally." Geoff > -----Original Message----- > From: vbox-dev-boun...@virtualbox.org [mailto:vbox-dev- > boun...@virtualbox.org] On Behalf Of Alexey Eremenko > Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 3:52 AM > To: vbox-dev@virtualbox.org > Subject: Re: [vbox-dev] support for spice? > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Any plans to support redhat's spice protocol? > > > > Interesting idea, but that may be problematic, because it requires > different virtual graphics card. > > That is, guest OSes cannot be switched easily between VirtualBox > graphics card and RedHat QXL GPU. > > -- > -"Technologov" > > _______________________________________________ > vbox-dev mailing list > vbox-dev@virtualbox.org > http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev _______________________________________________ vbox-dev mailing list vbox-dev@virtualbox.org http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev