Nikolay, I've got 8 cores on my system, so I can hand it all over to the guests without sweating it. I'm looking at top, and I don't see any indication that other system load is contending. When I stop other apps running, it's only the amount of CPU idle time in the host that goes down, while the guest maintains the same level of CPU utilisation.
The load I'm running is compilation. There shouldn't be a lot of system time, but the build system I'm using schedules a higher level of parallel jobs than there is CPU, using both CPU count and memory size to determine the maximum number of jobs. What nevertheless seems odd is that when the Solaris guest thinks it's got 3 or 4 threads on CPU, utilisation is half what I'd expect. Now, I can imagine a variety of reasons for this, plenty of which I don't properly or at all understand, but looking at CPUPalette.app (I'm not aware of anything on OS X that approximates the functionality of mpstat), it looks like the load on the system is being spread evenly across CPUs. My very naive reaction to this is that this isn't quite right, that VirtualBox should be trying to maintain processor affinity and pushing the CPU flat-out and not itself being subject to unnecessary additional SMP overhead, which is cumulative with the overhead of the guest. (My understanding is that the ability to create CPU affinity in OS X is a bit weak compared to compared to Linux or Solaris [i.e. affinity is between threads and is meant to be defined by applications based on hw.cacheconfig and friends, whereas in Linux and Solaris it can be defined more strictly in terms of processors and processes].) What do you reckon? Cheers, Bayard On 6 May 2011, at 11:17, Nikolay Igotti wrote: > Hi Bayard, > > Question is how do you generate load in guest, and what's are real > bottlenecks. Generally, guest SMP maps to multiple > threads of execution for guest code, but mind page table synchronization, > device access locks and other factors adding > overhead in SMP case sometimes more severe than it would be on the real box. > > Also if your box has just 4 CPUs I wouldn't recommend assign all them to the > guest. > > Thanks, > Nikolay > > > Bayard Bell wrote: >> Anyone? >> >> On 23 Apr 2011, at 11:50, Bayard Bell wrote: >> >> >>> I've got an OpenSolaris guest that I'm using as a compile server, with Mac >>> OS X Server as the host. I've assigned 4 CPUs to the guest, and the guest >>> in fact sees 4 CPUs. From the host perspective, however, what I see is that >>> the guest never ranges substantially above 200% (or 2 CPU) utilisation, >>> even when the run queue is backed up and 4 processes appear to be on the >>> CPU. I'm comparing the compile times to reference against other >>> configurations, and what I'm seeing in VirtualBox leads me to believe that >>> I'm being presented 4 CPUs but can't actually consume more than 2. I >>> haven't made any apples-to-apples comparison yet, but this nevertheless >>> seems to be able to keep the system running under load that can't be >>> sustained with only 2 CPUs assigned, which seems to indicate that the >>> benefits of assigning more than 2 CPUs may be more about reducing context >>> switching and CPU migration overhead on the guest than providing the full >>> benefit of increased compute resources (or: IOW words the benefit seems >>> equivalent to provide hyperthreaded virtual CPUs rather than cores). >>> >>> Is this expected behaviour? I've looked through the documentation and >>> wasn't able to find any information on this. I'm running 4.0.6 and also saw >>> this behaviour on 4.0.4. >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> vbox-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev >> > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ vbox-dev mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
