On 03/23/2015 12:30 PM, Alexey Eromenko wrote: > maybe a patch belongs to "kmemleak" ? If no problem with VBox, nothing to fix.
Alexey, Yes, kmemleak should likely be improved to recognize all allocations, but as I understand it, some such pointers are embedded in other structures and very difficult to find in the scan. If you do not want to accept the patch, I can understand it. On the other hand, finding the two real leaks that I had in the middle of over 4800 false positives from vboxdrv was a pain. At least, I will carry the patch locally. Larry _______________________________________________ vbox-dev mailing list vbox-dev@virtualbox.org https://www.virtualbox.org/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
