Hi experts,
I have a virtual device model plugged into VirtualBox 5.1.24 OSE via PDM, and I
am seeing a problem with the ICH9 fake BIOS support of prefetch space. Or
maybe that's not the right way to put it. Let me explain what I'm trying to do
and then my problem.
I actually have two different virtual device models. The first has a PCIe
switch plugged into host bus at 0:28:0, with secondary bus connected to an
endpoint at 3:0:0. The endpoint has two 64-bit BAR pairs, both with the
prefetch flag set, but they're small. The fake BIOS enumerates, sets up the
endpoint BARs and the bridge's prefetch-base/limit registers which I then use
to register the address range with PDMDevHlpMMIORegister(). This model works
well.
The second model has a PCI/PCIe switch inserted, so a bridge at 0:28:0, another
at 3:0:0, another at 4:0:0, and the endpoint at 5:0:0. This endpoint also
has two 64-bit BAR pairs, both with the prefetch flag set, one big one small.
When I try to register the address ranges with PDMDevHlpMMIORegister() it
returns VERR_MM_HYPER_NO_MEMORY.
First question is whether this is indeed the right way to get those address
redirected through PDM to my model? It seems to lead to memory allocation,
which I don't need since the memory is modeled in my virtual device. I just
need to take care of accesses within the range assigned by the fake BIOS.
Second question is whether someone can elaborate on this comment in
ich9pciBiosInitDeviceBARs()?
/* Hack: since this PCI init code cannot handle prefetchable BARs on
* anything besides the primary bus, it's for now the best solution
* to leave such BARs uninitialized and keep memory transactions
* disabled. The OS will hopefully be clever enough to fix this.
* Prefetchable BARs are the only ones which can be truly big (and
* are almost always 64-bit BARs). The non-prefetchable ones will not
* cause running out of space in the PCI memory hole. */
It is programming the prefetch-base/limit registers of all the bridges, so in
what way can the PCI init code not "handle prefetchable BARs on anything
besides the primary bus"? In what way can we hope the OS will be "clever
enough to fix this"? The lspci -vv command shows valid address ranges, based
on the base/limit registers, but the BARs won't respond if accessed. And is
there an issue with PCI addresses above 4G?
I will keep digging and learning, because I don't yet understand the connection
between this and VERR_MM_HYPER_NO_MEMORY - which I believe comes from
mmHyperAllocInternal() - but some insight would be helpful.
Thanks,
// RicV
_______________________________________________
vbox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.virtualbox.org/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
