Cameron Lowell Palmer wrote: > Hassle. I don't feel I should go the extra trouble. In the end I will > just use whatever gets my job done and dual boot back to linux. > > cameron. > > You can thank Apple for that, that`s for sure. ;P That`s what monopolies are for.
I would rather use patched one instead of dual booting, but your choice ;) > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Nikola M <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Cameron Lowell Palmer wrote: >> >>> Yeah I have already read that, and just about everything else on the >>> web related to Mac OSX as a guest. However, I am not interested in >>> running a modified/hacked OSX. I am using a Mac Pro. It seems the >>> necessary components would be a working Apple compatible EFI >>> implementation and driver support that would pass any OSX hardware >>> checks through to the Mac hardware. >>> >> Since you have license over OSX and you have Virtualbox, >> I don`t see why you shouldn`t use OSX you get from some other source. >> >> If OSX changed in some way (as BSD derivate itself OSX is) to run od PC >> hardware >> other then Apple PC (called Mac ), why not use it? _______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
