-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Sent: 15/01/2010, 02:38
To: [email protected]
Subject: vbox-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 18
Send vbox-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of vbox-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: teleportation (Umarzuki Mochlis)
2. Re: teleportation (Alexey Eremenko)
3. Windows 7 64 bit on top of Linux 32 bit. (Lars Bj?rndal )
4. Re: Windows 7 64 bit on top of Linux 32 bit. (Alexey Eremenko)
5. Re: Windows 7 64 bit on top of Linux 32 bit. (Robert Bronsdon)
6. Re: Windows 7 64 bit on top of Linux 32 bit. (Klaus Espenlaub)
7. Importing existing machines from 3.0 to 3.1.2 (James Mansion)
8. Re: Windows 7 64 bit on top of Linux 32 bit. (Jonathan Jesse)
9. Re: Importing existing machines from 3.0 to 3.1.2 (Mark Cranness)
10. Re: VBoxManage clonehd not working in 3.12? (S. W. Cohrs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:13:00 +0800
From: Umarzuki Mochlis <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [vbox-users] teleportation
To: Klaus Espenlaub <[email protected]>
Cc: VirtualBox end user list <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
2010/1/14 Klaus Espenlaub <[email protected]>
> Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
>
>> with vbox teleportation, can I create a same guest setting with an empty
>> virtualdisk (dynamic) and migrate a guest from other computer?
>>
>
> No. The disk contents are not migrated, so if you'd do this you'd probably
> end up with an instant crash once the migration is completed, as the disk
> contents isn't right. The assumption with live migration is that the virtual
> disk storage is shared between the migration source and target.
>
>
thanks for the explaination, it seems i misunderstood the term.
> Klaus
>
>
--
Regards,
Umarzuki Mochlis
http://debmal.my
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://vbox.innotek.de/pipermail/vbox-users/attachments/20100114/6eab2d9c/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:22:39 +0200
From: Alexey Eremenko <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [vbox-users] teleportation
To: VirtualBox end user list <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Umarzuki Mochlis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 2010/1/14 Klaus Espenlaub <[email protected]>
>>
>> Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
>>>
>>> with vbox teleportation, can I create a same ?guest setting with an empty
>>> virtualdisk (dynamic) and migrate a guest from other computer?
>>
>> No. The disk contents are not migrated, so if you'd do this you'd probably
>> end up with an instant crash once the migration is completed, as the disk
>> contents isn't right. The assumption with live migration is that the virtual
>> disk storage is shared between the migration source and target.
>>
Yes, currently this feature is too enterprisy...
I wrote my opinion regarding this topic: Live Migration for the masses
http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=25331&p=116910
--
-Alexey Eromenko "Technologov"
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:42:17 +0100
From: [email protected] (Lars Bj?rndal )
Subject: [vbox-users] Windows 7 64 bit on top of Linux 32 bit.
To: vbox-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi list!
Should that work? I'm currently running VirtualBox 3.0.12.
Thanks!
Lars
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:17:50 +0200
From: Alexey Eremenko <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [vbox-users] Windows 7 64 bit on top of Linux 32 bit.
To: vbox-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Lars Bj?rndal
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> Should that work? I'm currently running VirtualBox 3.0.12.
>
yes.
--
-"Technologov"
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:23:54 -0000
From: "Robert Bronsdon" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [vbox-users] Windows 7 64 bit on top of Linux 32 bit.
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <op.u6ix540ozjz...@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:17:50 -0000, Alexey Eremenko <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Lars Bj?rndal
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi list!
>>
>> Should that work? I'm currently running VirtualBox 3.0.12.
>>
>
> yes.
Only if your hardware supports 64bit. But yes it should work.
--
Using Opera M2: http://www.opera.com/mail/
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:39:29 +0100
From: Klaus Espenlaub <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [vbox-users] Windows 7 64 bit on top of Linux 32 bit.
To: Lars Bj?rndal <[email protected]>
Cc: vbox-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Lars Bj?rndal wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> Should that work? I'm currently running VirtualBox 3.0.12.
Documented in the manual. You need a 64bit CPU with AMD-V or VT-x to run
64bit guests on a 32bit host os.
Klaus
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:14:16 +0000
From: James Mansion <[email protected]>
Subject: [vbox-users] Importing existing machines from 3.0 to 3.1.2
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I upgraded from Vista 32 to Win7 64, so I installed a new VBox.
Couldn't make it see my existing machines - which are in an unusual
place, admittedly. It imports the portable format - but notits own
legacy ones. How bizarre is that?
Its only the machine definition that's a problem - I created a new one
and attached the old disk image. But it does seem very strange.
Have I missed something? I have some other machines I'd like to import too.
James
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:56:28 -0500
From: Jonathan Jesse <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [vbox-users] Windows 7 64 bit on top of Linux 32 bit.
To: Klaus Espenlaub <[email protected]>
Cc: vbox-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Klaus Espenlaub <[email protected]>wrote:
> Lars Bj?rndal wrote:
>
>> Hi list!
>>
>> Should that work? I'm currently running VirtualBox 3.0.12.
>>
>
> Documented in the manual. You need a 64bit CPU with AMD-V or VT-x to run
> 64bit guests on a 32bit host os.
>
> Klaus
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vbox-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
>
Check your BIOS usually not enabled by default
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://vbox.innotek.de/pipermail/vbox-users/attachments/20100114/b41234c1/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:48:44 +1300
From: Mark Cranness <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [vbox-users] Importing existing machines from 3.0 to
3.1.2
To: James Mansion <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
2010/1/15 James Mansion <[email protected]>:
> I upgraded from Vista 32 to Win7 64, so I installed a new VBox.
>
> Couldn't make it see my existing machines - which are in an unusual place,
> admittedly. ?It imports the portable format - but notits own legacy ones.
> ?How bizarre is that?
If they are in an unusual place, is the VirtualBox.xml also in the
same unusual place?
If so, see section 9.1 of the user manual for an environment variable
that let's VirtualBox know where the config is.
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:38:30 -0500
From: "S. W. Cohrs" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [vbox-users] VBoxManage clonehd not working in 3.12?
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <00df01ca9583$71a518a0$54ef49...@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
For the record, this worked! Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 6:11 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [vbox-users] VBoxManage clonehd not working in 3.12?
S. W. Cohrs wrote:
> When I run VBoxManage clonehd on my Vista 64 host, I get a message that
> says 'ERROR: Cannot register the hard disk <source hard disk> with UUID
> <source UUID> because a hard disk <source hard disk> with UUID <source
> UUID> already exists in the media registry <registry location>'. Am I
> missing something here? Reversing the parameters doesn't work... For
> some reason it doesn't pick up the target hard disk name (which IS
> different...)
>
> This is what I get. What have I screwed up?
You've just bumped into a quirk with relative filename handling in the
VirtualBox API. It's on the todo list to finally squash that bug. The
workaround is to pass absolute filenames to that command. If that
doesn't help, use the uuid for the source hard disk instead. And you
most likely also want to register the cloned image, so add --remember as
well.
Klaus
> L:\Virtual_Disks>"C:\Program Files\Sun\VirtualBox\vboxmanage" clonehd
> "Ubuntu904
>
> _64.vdi" "Ubuntu910_64.vdi"
[...]
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
vbox-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
End of vbox-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 18
******************************************
_______________________________________________
vbox-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
