:-)
But Ken, did you look at Agus's code? I noticed some additions with fck
and fps calls. Since I plan to migrate to newer versions of vpopmail and
qmailadmin (eventually ;-)), any comments on incorporation of this code
into 4.9.10/0.45 and your ideas for the future?
Faruque
At 02:48 PM 6/27/01 +0200, Ken Jones wrote:
>I like the idea of a file based method. Less code needs to be
>changed and it will work across all authentication modules.
>The thought of updating every auth module, and doing regression
>testing makes me want to run for the hills.
>
>Ken JOnes
>
>Syed Faruque Ahmed wrote:
> >
> > I think I will try Agus's patch, it sounds easy.
> >
> > Although putting in a flag in vpasswd file/table against a user seems more
> > sensible in the long run, it sounds rather complicated as a lot more
> > related code might have to be changed. I guess Ken can decide on this for
> > a new release, along with an "--enable-quotawarn" option ( ;-) slave
> > drivers we are).
> >
> > Ken, did you look at Agus's code? Any comments?
> >
> > Faruque
> >
> > At 04:16 PM 6/27/01 +0700, Agus Basyari wrote:
> >
> > > > chris wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've read the archive about this subject already, but still don't
> have a
> > > > > clear answer. I have hardquota set. I tested it and it worked
> > >correctly by
> > > > > bouncing a message > 1K back to the sender, while still allowing <1K
> > > > > messages to be delivered.
> > > > >
> > > > > What I haven't figured out is how to generate a message to the
> OWNER of
> > >the
> > > > > mail box that he/she is over quota and needs to clear out some mail.
> > > > >
> > > > > I saw other's ask this, but never saw a clear answer to that
> issue. I'd
> > > > > guess that the C code could be hacked to create an email to the
> owner at
> > >the
> > > > > same time as the "bounce" message, but that sounds more
> complicated than
> > >I
> > > > > think I can handle.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone else solve this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Chris Bunnell
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like a good feature. I do not need it myself.
> > > > How do we avoid sending a user multiple over quota
> > > > messages?
> > > >
> > > > Ken Jones
> > > >
> > >
> > >With my vdlivermail.c .. it will create ".quotawarn1" and ".quotawarn2"
> > >(with dot) ... and if this file is in user directory, then Admin mail will
> > >not send the warning message. If the quota is less then 80% .. then
> > >vdelivermail will delete both.
> > >
> > >If the quotas is becaming between 80 - 90% after more then 90%,
> vdelivermail
> > >will not send the 80% warning messages, but if you up agian more then 90%,
> > >the warning message will sending again, because it just delete the
> > >.quotawarn2. It's my setting in my system. But if you still do not
> want the
> > >system to send warning in this situation, you can edit the vdelivermail.c
> > >in your own setting, maybe not 80 and 90% but 80% and 95%, then you change
> > >0.9 with 0.95.
