> -----Original Message----- > From: Davide Giunchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:56 AM > To: Rhett Hermer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Qmailadmin feature request > > > Il 09:13, venerdì 7 febbraio 2003, Rhett Hermer ha scritto: > > If djb doesn't want to improve qmail with all of those > patches et al, then > > what's stopping us to write new MTA based on qmail design? > Is there any > > restriction that I am not aware of? > > I don't think that anybody here want to write > yet_another_mta, probably if > somebody is unhappy with qmail it will pass to postfix. > > Regards. > > -- > Davide Giunchi. > Membro del FoLUG (Forlí Linux User Group) - http://folug.linux.it > GPG Key available on http://www.keyserver.net > Fingerprint: 4BFF 2682 6A58 ECFE 071B A1A4 F2A3 9EFA 6494 81FD > >
Not to mention there are those of us that don't want 300 patches integrated into qmail. Patches should be used on an as-needed basis, not simply because they exist. And even then, it's highly recommended that one look for an add-on app that will supply the requested feature instead of patching the qmail source. Regards, Robert Kropiewnicki
