----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 1:14 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] domain quotas query
> On Saturday 19 July 2003 12:01, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: > > so gee, did i really stump the stars on this one? nobody out there has > > converted to domain quotas? > > Very few, I'd bet. > > I took a look at the new domain soft quota code a few months ago (you > might remember the heated discussion I had with the author), and finally > came to the conclusion that this code is definately NOT ready for prime > time. > > It's a valiant attempt, but it is buggy and fatally flawed in that it won't play > nicely with maildir++ applications like sqwebmail, Courier-IMAP, or maildrop. > > Stick with hard filesystem domain quotas, install that qmailadmin patch > that was floating around last year (it gave qmailadmin domain admins > the ability to reconfigure user quotas under a set domain limit), or > forget it. > > That's MHO, and I'm sticking to it. > > I think that if we really want domain quotas (and I, for one, do!) then we > need to get together with Sam of Courier IMAP fame and create a new > maildir+++ specification that will accomodate domain quotas. That way > everyone can continue playing nice together. > > HTH. I too share some concerns about the inclusion of domain quotas in the current development vpopmail In hindsight I believe it would have been better to sign off on a stable vpopmail, and then the new domain quota stuff could have been added to the next development series. I wonder if it would be hard to remove or not...? Was the domain quota additions limited to just a few functions, or was it pretty much substantial changes to much of vpopmail code? Michael.
