Hi,

At 13:15 30.06.04 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'd like to do whitelist receipients for my domains with Spamcontrol.
>http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/spamcontrol/README_spamcontrol.html
>
>In the documentation, it's write we can't use RECIPIENT features with 
>virtuals domains :
>
>The RECIPIENTS extension makes qmail-smtpd aware of acceptable local 
>RECIPIENTS. The RECIPIENTS are kept in 'fastforward' compatible cdbs for 
>a case-insensitve quick lookup during the SMTP session. The lookup is 
>done for RECIPIENTS whose domain part match an entry in control/locals 
>and is not applied for virtual domains.

This is true, unless you've modified (conf-spamcontrol) to allow
SPAMCONTROL to do whitelisting on all addresses as per rcpthosts.

>
>But some people say it's possible, so ?

conf-spamcontrol:

locals=no

./spamcontrol.sh -u 2212; ./spamcontrol.sh; make; make setup

>When I add a domain in control/locals, mails a not delivred :
>Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)

vpopmail is responsible for virtualdomain deliveries, whereas qmail is for
locals.

>A lots of spam in send to unexistent address :((, and my server have to 
>manage a lots of bounces. What is the best way in order to avoid this ?

The is no alternative to whitelisting. Whether you use the RECIPIENTS
extension (with SPAMCONTROL) or qmail-goodrcptto or whatever.

However, it only makes sense if YOU know all recipient addresses.

The next release of SPAMCONTROL / RECIPIENTS extension will allow
domain-wildlisting - a smart method to control incoming "rcpt to:" addresses.

regards.
--eh.

PS: I should put the next release of RECPIENTS extension next week on my
web page. It will coexist with SPAMCONTROL 2.2.

Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de/
Wiener Weg 8, 50858 Cologne | T: +49 221 484 4923 | F: ...24

Reply via email to