Mario:
We call rblsmtpd through tcpserver. This is the section of our tcpserver
shell start script:
/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 10 -r relays.ordb.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r
dnsbl.njabl.org \
-r opm.blitzed.org -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r blackholes.mail-abuse.org
Hope this answers your question.
-Simon
> Hi,
>
> Just asking... do you put all those in qmail-smtpd, or do you use another
> method ?
>
> Regards,
> Mário Gamito
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 8:52 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [vchkpw] RBLs
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Currently on our Qmail server cluster (3 servers scanning
>> SMTP traffic in and out) we're checking:
>>
>> relays.ordb.org
>> bl.spamcop.net
>> dnsbl.njabl.org
>> opm.blitzed.org
>> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
>> blackholes.mail-abuse.org
>>
>> via rblsmtpd. So far, we've noticed that Spamcop and Spamhaus
>> are the two most effective RBLs. ORDb, Blitzed, and
>> mail-abuse have not been as active as we'd hoped. We've also
>> not noticed an undue amount of overhead for our mail scanning servers.
>>
>> What I'd like to know is what some of you other admins are
>> using -- are there any we are missing that are effective? Has
>> anyone found that one of the above is not providing any
>> usefulness and could be dropped?
>>
>> Thanks! :)
>>
>> -Simon
>>
>
>
