On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:22:34 +0100, tonix (Antonio Nati) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciao Antonio, first of all compliments for your work in this patch. > I don't remember exactly, I studied a lot of documents and found same > tables that lead me to that decision (to have a close correspondence to > 5.x.x formats). I think should be better a 550 reply as RFC 2821: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (e.g., mailbox not found, no access, or command rejected for policy reasons) -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/