I definitely think this is a great idea.  Gives the faculty/staff members
more privileges but not *too* many privileges that they can cause other
issues.

David Creech
Technology Support Specialist
Computer Lab Coordinator

ITCS - Academic Computing
Austin Building - 102
East Carolina University
252-328-9544 
cree...@ecu.edu




On 11/3/10 1:59 PM, "Josh Thompson" <josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I'd like to add a new resource attribute for the resource group section
>of the 
>privileges that would be used to control access to mapping resources.  As
>things are now (using images/computers as an example), a user must have
>these 
>rights at a node with corresponding resource groups attributes to control
>image group to computer group mapping:
>
>user: imageAdmin
>resource: image group: manageGroup
>user: computerAdmin
>resource: computer group: manageGroup
>
>However, this also grants the user access to control which images are in
>the 
>image group and to control which computers are in the computer group.
>
>I'd like to add a new resource attribute that is called manageMapping
>that 
>would allow access to resource mapping to be controlled separately from
>resource grouping.  The benefit of this is that fewer computer groups can
>be 
>used.  Currently, if you want someone to be able to create their own
>image 
>groups and map them to computer groups, then you have to create duplicate
>computer groups if you want to make sure they don't have access to remove
>computers from existing computer groups (which could end up making a
>computer 
>unavailable because it might not be in any computer groups).
>
>Using this new attribute would make the above look like this:
>
>user: imageAdmin
>resource: image group: manageMapping
>user: computerAdmin
>resource: computer group: manageMapping
>
>and would not result in the user being able to control which images were
>in 
>the image group and which computers were in the computer group.
>
>I'd like to hear feedback from the community on this to see what others
>think.
>
>Thanks,
>Josh
>- -- 
>- -------------------------------
>Josh Thompson
>VCL Developer
>North Carolina State University
>
>my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iEYEARECAAYFAkzRovoACgkQV/LQcNdtPQMfSwCdEWoRgdlYeBN1RFs/84XE4FV0
>XOEAn3Mif3ZbzNAHHv7vqv52h8JiQsPx
>=5Ir8
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to