I don't like the idea of another delay, but if this is just a matter of waiting one week until after the ASF meeting on June 20, then I would be inclined to wait -- especially if we have a quality release candidate ready to go.
At the same time, though, I would really encourage everyone who plans to test a post-graduation RC4 to take a close look at the current RC3. Aaron C On Jun 12, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Henry Schaffer wrote: > While I'd like to see 2.3 out, I think that the attention to testing > is really important and shouldn't be rushed. Even non-code aspects > such as getting the cwiki documentation all lined up and the obsolete > stuff removed is important. > > Isn't the vote on graduation due later this month? If so, I think > that doing an extra week or two of cleaning/polishing might be worth > it in terms of looking good to the community. And then if the release > is post-graduation kevan's comments apply and 2.3 will look more like > a really solid product. > > That's my 2ยข > > --henry > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Aaron Peeler <fapee...@ncsu.edu> wrote: >> I like the idea of having a post graduation release, but also would >> like to get 2.3 out. >> >> I would support either decision in how the community wants to go. >> >> Aaron >> >>> >>> At this point, we may want to consider a 2.3 release post-graduation. There >>> are some advantages for this. There will be some desires for a >>> non-incubating release (no incubator in the name, no incubator disclaimer, >>> etc). >>> >>> --kevan
