Great. I just created an issue for this at

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VCL-602

Everett

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Josh Thompson <josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Everett,
>
> I'd definitely like to see rpms for installing VCL.
>
> Josh
>
> On Friday, June 29, 2012 9:24:03 AM Everett Toews wrote:
> > Does anyone on the VCL core dev team have an interest in this? Should we
> > create a JIRA issue for it?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Everett
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Curtis C. <serverasc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I've been working on an initial spec file for VCL 2.2.1. Currently I
> > > believe all the dependencies, CPAN modules included, can be obtained
> > > from the EPEL and RPMForge repositories. If the project is going to
> > > support RHEL and CentOS only then providing a RPM could allow you to
> > > remove the requirement to run (and maintain) the perl libs install
> > > script.
> > >
> > > Still a bit more work to do, but I thought I would send it along
> > > before I get too far to find out if anyone has
> > > suggestions/comments/criticisms. :)
> > >
> > > You can see it here:
> > > https://github.com/cybera/rpmspecs/blob/master/vcl.spec
> > >
> > > Right now it creates 3 packages: a main doc package (just contains the
> > > sql files right now), a web package, and a management node package.
> > >
> > > One question I have is about the:
> > >
> > > use VMware::Vix::Simple;
> > > use VMware::Vix::API::Constants
> > >
> > > in the VIX_API.pm file. Those libraries are not, AFAIK, distributed
> > > with VCL and the official install docs don't ask to have them
> > > installed either. But the rpmbuild process picks those modules up as
> > > requirements.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Curtis.
> - --
> - -------------------------------
> Josh Thompson
> VCL Developer
> North Carolina State University
>
> my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
>
> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk/x6aIACgkQV/LQcNdtPQMR2QCfaC+Z2pMsgSqzz9VF+TTtsvoy
> o6oAn04jjYZJqKL6Uq+2JjJiTVSwNzB+
> =1SdY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

Reply via email to