also sprach Teemu Ikonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.01.1243 +0200]: > I thought about this some more and indeed there are problems. > Generating patches based on just one tag in the integration branch > probably would work when all the topic branches are still alive (i.e. > there is a head ref which can be used to find all the commits > belonging to the branch),
Since you merged the branches, they are alive up until the point of the tag. If we want to get a patch series for 0.2-1, we don't care *at all* about what happened after the debian/0.2-1 tag, so it doesn't matter whether the branch refs still exist or not. > Your idea of storing two tags per topic branch per release is much > more robust, although without automated tagging of all the branch > heads and bases and linking them to a master tag in the integration > branch it will be too laborious for practical use IMHO. Of course. tg-tag would take care of it, and it would take a list of branches that all get the same tag. Then, some sort of higher-level wrapper like git-bp could do the git-tag and tg-tag transaction. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems infinite loop: see 'loop, infinite'. loop, infinite: see 'infinite loop'.
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list vcs-pkg-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss
