On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:40:15AM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > I don't have a need for it either - just iff we want to have a > qualifier inside the braces we should at least use the type of VCS > not only "Commit:".
OK, but note that there are drawbacks. For example if we go for "(Git:af14e5)" that would be annoying, as parsing will depend on the number of supported, or "known", VCS. That was a wrong design choice of Vcs-* which I don't want to repeat. Hence, if we really want a VCS tag it should be something easily skipped over, e.g.: "(Commit:Git:af14e5)" where one can skip the tag and look only at the ID if she wants so. Frankly speaking though, this notation already looks too cumbersome to me. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list vcs-pkg-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss
