Yes, it's great idea to create the repositary for VDR Goga
-----Original Message----- From: Vladimir Kangin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: VDR Mailing List <vdr@linuxtv.org> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:21:23 +0300 Subject: Re: [vdr] VDR Development > If it would be helpful for the project VDR we can contribute by setting > up server at our DC. We are supporting LinuxMCE distro and also want to > help to VDR as a part of LinuxMCE project. > > Best regards, > Vladimir > > On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 08:02 -0700, VDR User wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Magnus Hörlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Of course you can fork it, and I'm sure someone eventually will, but I > > > think > > > you should regard it as a totally different project and give it some other > > > name. This would lead to plugin developers having to decide which > > > project(s) > > > to support and it will probably just be a mess. > > > I think VDR is Klaus's "child" and should remain so. > > > > Woah, wait a minute here! Nobody is suggesting to take VDR away from > > Klaus! There are clearly some good coders who want to continue > > helping progress VDR along as they already have been. The last > > released VDR update (1.7.0) was made 144 days ago. Everything people > > needed from VDR before still holds except not much development has > > been done and VDR hasn't moved forward. As much as I hate to say it, > > this is one of the main reasons so many users have abandoned VDR in > > favor of MythTV and other software. > > > > Again, nobody is suggesting to take VDR from Klaus.. Just simply allow > > progress to be made without these huge gaps where nothing happens > > where the users continue to be left in the cold while VDR continues to > > be left behind. Surely there are coders "worthy" of Klaus's 'coding > > approval' and if he doesn't want to work on VDR directly, it would > > still allow those that do to move forward and he can review the code > > rather then write it. Or have a dev tree and main tree. People can > > work on dev tree and what Klaus "approves" of could be adopted into > > main tree. > > > > Let's be clear... I've been a huge advocate for VDR. I do not want to > > see the project die, nor do I enjoy watching so many users abandon it. > > However, when much needed changes aren't made, what do you expect > > people to do? I can promise I didn't bring this topic up again to > > cause a problem. Only to point out that VDR is in need of help and > > there must be some way to move forward. Especially for the guys who > > are ready & willing! > _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
