I agree that OSD should be set to the output of the device's resolution. Not the video content it self. Would really love to see that change happen.
On 04/05/2009, Nicolas Huillard <nico...@huillard.net> wrote: > Matthias Becker a écrit : > > > and what about anamorphic material? > > A 16:9 SD broadcast in fact still is 4:3 but is streached by the TV to > > 16:9 to look ok (no egg-heads). > > Wouldn't it be correct also to draw the OSD anamorphic so that is not > > screached by the TV? > > > > Did you get the point? It's somehow difficult to describe this topic for > me. > > > With today's pixel-displays, we'd like to avoid all scaling, stretching, > etc. done by the panel itself. ie. like Rolf said, always output from > the computer at panel resolution, with 1:1 pixel mapping. > Video would be scaled, but not the OSD. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > 2009/5/4 Rolf Ahrenberg <rahre...@cc.hut.fi>: > >> On Mon, 4 May 2009, Falk Spitzberg wrote: > >> > >>> The OSD should adopt to the size of the video material. If that is > >>> scaled to some non TV screen size, the OSD is scaled by the same > factor. > >> I still disagree. If you scale down your OSD to video resolution (i.e. > >> 544x576) and afterwards scale up the both video and OSD to output > >> resolution (i.e. 1280x720), the OSD really looks crap due to scaling > >> artefacts. > > > -- > > NH > > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr@linuxtv.org > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr >
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
