On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Gero <geronimo...@gmx.de> wrote: > Well, *I* think, that there's a big difference between keeping things in order > compared to spreading things all over the place.
I can't stand when things are installed all over the place. It's too messy and pointless in my opinion. I'm in the habit of simply running VDR from it's source dir and using symlinks. It makes things very easy like archiving working/test sources, changing between versions without any needless 'reinstall'ing, etc. I see no benefit what-so-ever to installing over running VDR from the source dir, unless of course you're using pre-compiled binaries. As far as the patch, is it really necessary to split the files up even further? What is the real benefit? Also, don't different distros use different dir structures, so what's common on some may not be on others? If this is an attempt to standardize something, it's probably best to find a standard that exists across _all_ distros (if this isn't the case here). _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
