----- Original Message ----- > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 04:53:04AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Sorry for cross-posting, but in this case I think it's relevant. > > > > The original idea was that every time we wish to discuss a new > > cross-component feature we should do it over arch list. However, > > it would appear that de-facto usually engine-devel and vdsm-devel > > are being used (cross posted). > > Currently engine-devel has 211 subscribers, arch has 160 and > > vdsm-devel has 128 so from this perspective again, arch seems less > > relevant. > > I propose we ditch arch and keep the other 2 mailing lists. > > I'm not sure whether new cross-component features should be > > discussed solely on engine-devel or cross-posted (there are > > probably people who wouldn't care about engine side but would > > still like to know about such changes). > > +1 to ditching arch. I would still prefer that cross-component > features > cross-post to vdsm-devel and engine-devel. My current focus is on > vdsm and the > traffic level on that list is currently far more manageable than that > of > engine-devel.
That's my sentiment as well (plus I have a rule to drop duplicates so I don't care much about it ;) > > -- > Adam Litke <a...@us.ibm.com> > IBM Linux Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel