HSM is not a package it's an application. Currently it and the rest of VDSM share the same process but they use RPC to communicate. This is done so that one day we can actually have them run as different processes. HSM is not something you import, it's a daemon you communicate with.
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com> > To: "Saggi Mizrahi" <smizr...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Sheldon" <shao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, > vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, "Zheng Sheng > ZS Zhou" <zhshz...@cn.ibm.com> > Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 12:01:28 PM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] [VDSM][RFC] hsm service standalone > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 11:35:44AM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote: > > There are a bunch of precondition to having HSM pulled out. > > On simple things is that someone needs to go through > > storage/misc.py and utils.py and move all the code out to logical > > packages. > > There also needs to be a bit of a rearrangement of the code files > > so they can import the reusable code properly. > > > > I am also still very much against putting core VDSM in to > > site-packages. > > Would you elaborate on your position? Do you mind the wrong > implications > this may give about API stability? > > _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
