"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I like very much the idea of placing few if any requirements on the tools - > that the toolbox descriptor should suffice -> I would want to be able to > specify java.lang.String as a tool and control where and how it was used...
Indeed, _any_ Java class or primitive should be able to be added to the toolbox (just as in DVSL). This is a very useful and powerful piece of functionality. Additionally, when adding objects to the toolbox I would find it very useful for an alternate Factory to be use which has the ability to do object pooling and perform initialization/resource reclamation activites. This allows a certain amount of framework functionality without introducing an actual framework -- just an integration point. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
