On Mar 11, 2004, at 1:13 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr said:On Mar 11, 2004, at 12:24 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:Geir Magnusson Jr said:On Mar 11, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:Marin� A. J�nsson said:Four of the five errors are because of two methods in the
o.a.v.t.s.StrutsUtils class that have been deprecated in Velocity
Tools
v1.1, and will be removed in v1.2. They do not result from broken
interfaces in Struts - we were using classes and variables that had
been
deprecated in Struts v1.1 and apparently have been removed from
Struts v1.2.
yeah, i saw these in the nag when it first started. i don't know what to do about it, except try and get our 1.1 out and remove the deprecated stuff as planned.
How far away is it? can you just branch at the 1.1 tag and then fix head? All gump will care about is head.
we put out 1.1-rc1 a couple weeks ago. no reports of problems since, and no plans to add features. the only change i'm thinking of making right now is Nathan Green's patch to fix all those stupid javadoc warnings during the build. so, i figure we'll just let rc1 stew for a few more weeks and then release 1.1 final.
as for branching, there is no plain "1.1" tag yet, and my experience of CVS doesn't yet include making branches so i'm not even sure what that involves.
Then how do you have any idea what you put out as 1.1?
that's what tags are for. each release so far is marked by a tag on the main
(and only) branch.
Oh - you can convert that to a branch if you want.
Here is what I do w/ Vel. I branch w/ the version (VEL_1_3_BRANCH) and then tag on releases of that version. 1.1-rc1, 1.1-rc2, 1.1 1.1.1, etc
so you branch before there's any release? hmm.
At the time of release so there's no problems with subsequent work
so if you haven't changed since releaseing 1.1-rc1, you could do the same, and then fix head, knowing that you can keep going on the 1.1 branch for release, and any subsequent fixes or changes is you so desired (like if you wanted a 1.1.1 for a fix to 1.1.)
hmm. well, i don't have time to work on veltools right now anyway (though i
will try to find some for the javadoc patch). i guess if i find the time
before 1.1 final to make branching before then worth the effort, then i'll
think about this more. otherwise, if you or Marino want to branch to fix the
gump failures before then, i guess i don't have any objections.
I just thought you'd want to quiet gump down...
The good thing is that it helped the struts community find that breakage before they went rc
geir
-- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
