Nathan Bubna said: > Marin� A. J�nsson said: > > Sorry, I haven't touched Nathan's patch ... and there were no > > manual javadoc > > fixes ... the javadoc commits in the HEAD were because they were all > > marked as 1.1 RC1. > > sorry, i still don't get it. javadocs are generated. if there's javadoc > changes, then some source/control file must have changed, and i didn't see > where. did i just miss it?
ah. i get it now. *i* changed the control file when i changed the build.xml from 1.1-rc1 to 1.1-dev. :) the catch is that actually we don't really need/want the subsequent change in the javadocs to be committed. the committed javadocs are really for the sake of the public website on jakarta.apache.org. it's really the only reason we have them checked in. and since we want the javadoc on the website to match the most recent release (rather than the nightly builds), we really only need/want to commit javadoc changes when we do a release. still, as long as we haven't updated the public site from CVS (and i presume you haven't), we should be fine. no harm done. Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
