On 9/27/05, Tim Colson (tcolson) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it ain't broke, and I don't need the new features, and there isn't a > "critical" fix/update/improvement in the old lib then it may stay at 1.x > forever. ;-)
Definitely! I'm still using 1.3.1 for most things :) And I doubt I'd upgrade old projects to use a newer version of velocity. On 9/27/05, Tim Colson (tcolson) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i meant dep in 1.0, leave in 1.1, remove in 1.2 > Ok, then I'm solid +1 > > major versions shouldn't care about B.C. patches shouldn't mess with > > anything more than they have to. Yes, let's not allow B.C. continue to propagate bugs as features indefinitely. Let's see some consistent and predictable null and whitespace handling. Then, I'll be interested in upgrading to a new version of velocity. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
