"Will Glass-Husain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>RE: 2.0 -- I think that's a good idea.
>I'm not all that bright when it comes to cvs/svn branching... would it
>be possible in the AFS infra to branch the svn repo so that this patch
>(and others) could be available in a 2.0 branch for playing around?
I'm -0 to pushing this patch to 2.0. This is 1.5 material because it
enhances what is there and does not break backwards compatibility.
For 2.0 we should stop doctoring the symptoms, take a step back and
think long and hard about where we want to go with logging.
(It seems that configuration and logging will stay the bane of all
component development indefinitely... ;-) )
Best regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
4 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 42
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
