[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-6?page=all ]

Tim Colson moved VELOCITY-407 to VELTOOLS-6:
--------------------------------------------

        Project: VelocityTools  (was: Velocity)
            Key: VELTOOLS-6  (was: VELOCITY-407)
      Component: Unknown
                     (was: Tools)
           type: Improvement  (was: Wish)
    Fix Version:     (was: Tools-1.2)
        Version:     (was: Tools-1.2)

> Templates vs. static content should be resolvable via file naming pattern
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: VELTOOLS-6
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-6
>      Project: VelocityTools
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: Unknown
>  Environment: all
>     Reporter: Claude Brisson
>     Priority: Minor

>
> The VelocityViewServlet.getTemplate() method should append ".vtl"
> to the URI by default (and only handle .vtl files in its servlet-mapping
> clause).
> So, a request http://www.foo.com/bar.html would map :
> 1. to a template bar.html.vtl if found
> 2. to a regular html file bar.html otherwise
> Beyond the first basic samples, any webapp will need such a behaviour.
> So all application designers will have to subclass VelocityViewServlet to do 
> it.
> Why not then incorporate it by default ? It looks rather important to me. 
> Having
> to subclass the VelocityViewServlet for each and every project is really 
> silly.
> Since there is a backward compatibility issue, one could trigger the 
> behaviour with
> a configuration flag and wait for the tools 2.0 to have the default changed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to