On 11/9/05, Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >Vote:  VelocityTools 1.2 final release
> >[X] +1 I fully support this release.
> >[ ] +0 I like it, but...
> >[ ] -0  I'm not sure this is a good idea because...
> >[ ] -1  I am against this because...
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Actually I was -0 first, because I do want to get the envelope site
> idea on the road, but I will only be able to do so starting next
> sunday. But I feel that there is no harm done by getting the 1.2 release
> out now. We could easily push a 1.2.1 which integrates into a changes site
> structure later. I always would like to work on the build process for the
> tools to make it look more like the velocity core build.

well, i appreciate the +1.  :)  now, barring a veto from Will or
Daniel, we're good to go.  which is good, because i'm swamped with
work thru the holidays.  it'll be all i can do to get this thing out
the door this weekend.

and yes, it would be great to touch up the build to echo that of the
velocity core a bit more.    i'm not totally sure about rolling a new
build just for the envelope site stuff (which i'm looking forward
to!), but i might easily be talked into supporting it. :)

> At some point we might also start to discuss whether having three (four?)
> different jars is really a good idea. :-)

oh yes.  i'm doubtful that the tri-jar approach will continue into the
next version.  it has been prohibitive of some changes i've been
wanting to make.  this is another reason why i'm continually more
inclined toward working on a 2.0 version next, rather than a 1.3.  but
again, my time will be severly limited now thru december, so those
plans may be on hold until then unless someone else steps up.

>         Best regards
>                 Henning
>
>
>
> >My vote is, of course, +1.  Please register your opinions by Thursday.
> > On Friday, I will notify the PMC of the results (assuming the vote
> >passes), and then I'll try to push out the release to the mirrors by
> >Sunday.  For reference, the steps left in the approved release plan
> >are:
>
> >5) a.  Call for vote to final release, wait a few days for results,
> >then notify PMC
> >    b.  Rebuild as VelocityTools 1.2 and upload for mirroring and all that
> >    c.  Update VelocityTools website docs
> >    d.  Announce final release to the various lists, and update
> >various news pages
>
> >thanks,
> >nathan
>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/
>
> RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
>    Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
>
>                       4 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 42
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to