On 2/25/06, Robert Koberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep, any chance of answering the questions above? > > <snip/> > > > I would be surprised as well. But were I doing serious XML processing, > > I wouldn't be using a templating engine for anything but templating. > > > > Yep, I would use XSL/SAX/[some]DOM for serious XML processing. I was > trying to get to the limits/functionality/ability of DVSL. From the > (lack of) response from Geir, I don't think DVSL should be compared to > (marketed as) XSL.
Rob, In terms of answering your questions, I would just look at the few DVSL examples and kick the tires so to speak. A few years back I wrote a prototype of the code metrics system that took the XML reports from findbugs, checkstyle, pmd, and others and transformed that into HTML. I was relatively new to both DVSL and XSLT, and DVSL worked pretty well for my needs while XSLT quickly became very laborious for complex transformations. -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
