Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
"Mike Kienenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'd recommend keeping the docs in an xml format -- documentation
standards seem to change every year.
I'm really +1 here.
I can tell you folks what I did in my free (hah!) time in the last two weeks:
- I checked whether there is a decent tool to edit xdocs. Basically there is
not. There isn't even a DTD of xdoc, which makes it even harder to use an
XML editor.
- I looked into OpenOffice 2.x and its docbook support. It should work, however
I wasn't really able to get it to run. And the docbook <-> OpenOffice
mappings are not really intuitive. And the result is that it produces not
really a web site.
I will check out the XMLMind editor but I don't see how it will really
help unless someone sits down and writes an xdoc CSS.
Basically what the docs could really use is a DTD of xdoc. I'm not
aware that such a thing exists (which might be explained with the fact
that not really a good xdoc documentation exists... =8-/ )
It should be very straightforward as xdoc is so simple...
geir
Best regards
Henning
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
