"Nathan Bubna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I do however see little reason not to make the PublicFieldUberspect
>(or something like it) available in the core distribution. Many
>people have asked for this over the years (though less since
>JSTL/JSP2.0 came out), and it's not trivial to write for yourself if
>you haven't looked at the uberspector stuff before. Why not make it a
>simple configuration change to enable this, rather than a
>code-a-new-thing and configure change?
I'm +1 here. If code is already available, we can either put it into a
"contrib" section or include it, document it and not enable it by
default.
That's basically the same thing I've proposed with "Iterable" support
for JDK 1.5+
Best regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
Social behaviour: Bavarians can be extremely egalitarian and folksy.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavaria
Most Franconians do not like to be called Bavarians.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franconia
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
