> >> (I've previously argued we should make the entire language > >> case-insensitive). > >Interesting... I could go +1 for that. > Why? How about a hash map that contains "foo", "Foo", "FOO" and > "foO". What would Hmm... well, for hashmap, the introspector passes verbatim whatever it sees (as far as I know)... so it would still probably work.
But it's a good counter example, and along with the getXML / getXml example, I guess you ahve convinced that Velocity is fine just the way it is with respect to case sensitivity. :-) This is a good example of why Velocity sometimes does not change quickly. We have debates like this all the time where it isn't always clear if the change would be considered a "Good Thing" by a majority. (Christoph -- feel free to plug your whitespace handling option here. <grin>) Cheers, Timo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
