Jason Pettiss wrote:
Jonathan at this point about thalf the bandwith of this list is you
responding to people while mainly advocating Freemarker and getting
annoyed with people for not liking it due to the syntax. Maybe you
should go argue with people on the Freemarker user list?
Jason, is anybody forcing you or anybody else to read any of these messages?
If not, what precisely is your grievance?
Because this is a velocity users lists. And you're not a velocity user.
Well, actually, this is an open, public discussion forum in which
anybody can participate. Moreover, nobody, to my knowledge has appointed
you as a censor. Now, if you want to advocate censorship, go ahead. I
don't know what the proper channels for that are. Ask Henning or some
guy like that.
But meanwhile, if I'm involved in a discussion with people, why on earth
should I pay any heed to somebody who was not at all involved in said
discussion, and who, AFAICT, has nothing constructive to contribute to
it, yet keeps butting in telling me to shut up?
You know, Jason, there's a permanent archive of these messages
maintained. You should cool off and think about whether you want people
to be able to observe this kind of behavior on your part -- in perpetuity.
Jonathan Revusky
--
freemarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Will Glass-Husain wrote:
Please don't. Let's keep discussion on topic - no more
meta-discussion thanks.
If you'd like to take it to personal mail, feel free.
I'm sorry, Will. That doesn't wash. Chris specifically said that I was
engaging in "one-way abuse". I have no idea (and I don't think anybody
can have on the basis of his message) what he's talking about. He has
stated this in public and should back up what he was saying in public.
Or he can simply retract the statement, that's okay too.
But he should either back up the statement or retract it. These are
basic rules of responsible, adult discourse.
Jonathan Revusky
--
freemarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Thanks, WILL
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Revusky"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <velocity-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [ANN] Viento - WHY?
Chris, I'm sorry that you perceive things this way. I am not sure
which messages you are referring when you discuss "one-way abuse"
from me. Could you provide the specific links to such messages and
point out which passages you consider most egregious?
Thanks,
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
