To me, volume groups are all about location.  Volume pool are all about content.
 
Every physical location, library, shelf, offsite, etc., has two volume groups, one for LTO1 & the other for LTO2 (for whatever annoying reason, tapes within a single VG must be the same type). 
 
Volume pools are about what data goes on the tape.  Oracle data goes to one pool, Filer data to another, NT, Unix FS, etc.
 
Now - for offsite purposes, I create two tapes, one for onsite and the other for offsite.  The onsite & offsite backups are written to two different tape pools.  This makes the tapes that need to go offsite easy to identify.  I eject the tapes in the offsite pool (where there belong to the VG for the library) and send them offsite.  My offsite process changes the Volume Group from "Library-hcart2" to "Offsite-hcart2".  The pool remains unchanged (couldn't change it if you wanted - NB fixes the pool until the tape is empty).
 
I set the return date of the tape at the same time - the same as the retention period.  When the tape is returned, it's fully expired of images & I just stuff it back in the library.  We have the good luck to keep all the blank media in-library.  If it wasn't, though, if you're volume groups are accurate (and I have a gizmo to find discrepencies) then your out-of-library-but-still-blank media is fairly easy to find - just find tapes in the Scratch pool (or who are unassigned) and in the "Shelf" volume group & inject them as needed.
 
HTH - M
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:23 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Volume Pools

I'm working on a transition on some of our sites from Backup Exec to Netbackup and I'm wondering about their use of Volume Pools.  One of our sites uses volume pools as "buckets" for tapes they take offsite.  Aka... a 3_mo_offsite VP and a 1_yr_offsite VP.  Still others use the defaults... or some make up their own.  The problem I am finding is that you constantly have to track which media needs to be reloaded or make sure you have a boat load of scratch media available just incase.  Any better ideas on volume pools / how do you guys use them effectively?
 
-Jonathan

Reply via email to