I should have said you must use media from a VOLUME POOlL whose name begins with a prefix of ENCR_.
On 2/9/09, Travis Kelley <rhat...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've used the netbackup KMS and it does work fine, although its sort > of a kluge right now in my opinion. Currently you are limited to 2 > keychains and you must use media from a policy whose name begins with > a prefix of ENCR_ (for instance ENCR_Offsite). I've talked with our > account rep and they state that they "anticipate" to raise the number > of keys that can be managed in NB.7. They also anticipate it to > become a chargable item after the expansion but haven't worked out the > details yet. > > It seems like functionality that still needs a good bit of work and > will probably get it in the future but is now more of a POC. On the > plus side...its currently free and works fine in my experience, so its > great to try out if you already have the LTO4 drives. > > On 2/8/09, Len Boyle <len.bo...@sas.com> wrote: >> Good Day, >> >> We have a few IBM LTO-4 tape drives for which, we would like to start >> using >> the build in encryption support with Netbackup 6.5.3 >> >> >> >> Early reading seems to indicate that there are at least two key managers >> to >> choose from. >> >> The first is IBM's EKM java key manager. >> >> The second is Netbackup's KMS, which came out as part Netbackup 6.5.2 . >> >> Does anyone have experience with these two products that they can share. >> Experiences both good and bad. >> >> Thanks len >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu >> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > -- Sent from my mobile device _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu