If you ARE thinking of copying old tape to new tapes - here are some thoughts!
1. if your old tapes are multiplexed you might want to look into copying them to a disk or VTL then to a tape, since the shoe shining you experience is horrible if you try to copy tape to tape, unless you keep the multiplexing. 2. I am copying some backups from 2006 (~ 3 years old), and experiencing some increased failure rates, as well as drive issues with these tapes that have sat at iron mountain for 3 years. 3. Plan on it taking some time! AND those drives not being available during that time! > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 12 >Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:58:14 -0400 >From: Jorge F?bregas <jorge.fabre...@gmail.com> >Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Transition from LTO1 to LTO4 >To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu >Message-ID: <200908221558.15149.jorge.fabre...@gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > >> Have you looked at your data to see if it's feasible to keep your old >> library long enough to duplicate your long-term retention data to LTO4 >> and then get rid of the LTO1s when you've duped everything that hasn't >> already expired? > >That sounds like a nice mini-project. I totally agree and will look forward >for doing it. The fact that I can consolidate, at least, about (8) LTO1 tapes >into (1) LTO4 tape is pretty tempting! > >> This may well reopen up another favorite topic: retention and the >> costs/logic/risks in keeping and trusting the usefulness and recoverability >> of old data. > >I Agree :) > >All the best, >Jorge > > >------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu