Ok,

All you are writing at your email are doable.

Puredisk as a client deduplication has many limitations. Using puredisk at
media level is ok.

For the remote offices there are three choices, regarding your data and your
money. 

A)     You can use one  netbackup 7 media server with deduplication.

B)      You can use a netbackup 7 media server and a  puredisk server
(PDDO). 

C)       You can use backup exec 2010 deduplication and replicate to
netbackup 7. (this is something I haven't test, just hear of it ) 

Netbackup license is per TB. Puredisk has a 256 MB license. Backup exec has
a list price of ~$2700 per backup exec server (yes!!). Choose the cheaper
that works for you. 



But:

You are going to use it with VCS.  For me this is mandatory, as if you lose
one puredisk server you will lose all puredisk environment. Unfortunately
the   <http://www.in.gr/dictionary/lookup.asp?Word=implementation>
implementation of VCS with purdisk is not the optimal. This is something I
found the hard way. Also, talking before some days with a Symantec
representative, he was very surprised that I have a clustered puredisk
installation. And I was surprised that he was surprised. To my mind,
clustered puredisk installations are mandatory, as I said. 

 

If you continue with cluster puredisk, be aware that patch 6.6.0.2 which is
solving many bugs, is not tested with clusters. In fact brakes the cluster's
node relationship.

I do not know if they fix it now, but install it right after the initial
installation and be prepared to call support.

 

Apart this problem, puredisk does what it has to do and with huge success.
I recommend it for your environment, but only for what you described at your
email.

And do not let the Symantec tech to leave, before you get good restore
speed..

 

If anybody wants to know what limitations puredisk client side dedup has:

A)     There is a limit of 50 million files per data selection. (that is "no
of files of the system" x "retention". For a server with 3 ,5 milion files
you can have 14  retention) This kind of servers are always static and good
for client dedup. But there is this limit. You can break the data selection,
but who wants to take the risk  to do it manually.

B)       Does not support clusters.. I do not know if there is  any company
that has his exchange in a standalone system.  And there is an exchange
agent..

C)      It does not restore fast enough without tweaking. But this is not in
the manuals. Even Symantec support does not know about. We had to open there
eyes.

D)     If you are a netbackup admin, the puredisk 6.6 GUI is very ugly. And
it is better than puredisk 6.5. 

E)      You cannot export to tape from a replicated puredisk. This is
something I cannot understand.

 

As netbackup deduplication is based on puredisk 6.6 binaries, almost all
limitations of puredisk exists at netbackup 7. But you can bypass them
easily.  

 

Again, as I said, puredisk for your environment is a good choice. 

 

Sorry for my English. I hope that you can understand the mining of what I
want to write. 

stefanos

 

From: Chapman, Scott [mailto:scott.chap...@icbc.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 9:11 PM
To: smpt; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.x to Puredisk cluster

 

We would use the Puredisk product similar to how we would use a DD device,
it would backend the Master/media servers as a backup location.  We need the
environment to be able to cut some tape from the backups that were written
to the disk backup location.  We will also need the disk backup location to
be able to replicate to another similar device at another location; the
important part of that replication is that the NetBackup master needs to
know about both of the copies.

 

At this point we won't be using the NetBackup 7 dedup as it is limited, it
only does 37TB I believe??  Whereas the Puredisk or DD devices can manage
much more than that.  Down the road, I'm thinking that I can use the
NetBackup 7 media server dedup to write dedup backups at our two small sites
and replicated to the puredisk cluster in our HO.  I know I won't be able to
do this with the DD device without buying two more small ones.so this is why
I'm wondering out Puredisk..

 

Thanks!

 

Scott Chapman

Senior Technical Specialist

Storage and Database Administration

ICBC - Victoria

Ph:  250.414.7650  Cell:  250.213.9295

From: smpt [mailto:sm...@peppas.gr] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:04 AM
To: Chapman, Scott; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.x to Puredisk cluster

 

Clarify how you will use puredisk and if you will use the standalone
puredisk product or netbackup 7 deduplication option.

 Then we can talk..

stefanos

 

From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Chapman,
Scott
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:12 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.x to Puredisk cluster

 

I'm wondering if anyone out there is writing backups though NetBackup 6.5.x
Media server to Puredisk?  If so, what is your feedback?  I'm wanting to
compare puredisk to a data domain device.

 

Thanks!

 

Scott Chapman

Senior Technical Specialist

Storage and Database Administration

ICBC - Victoria

Ph:  250.414.7650  Cell:  250.213.9295

  _____  

This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized
copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named
recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error
or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all
copies of this email immediately.

 <http://icbc.com/> Image removed by sender. 2010 Olympic and Paralympic
Logo | ICBC Logo

  _____  

This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized
copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named
recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error
or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all
copies of this email immediately.

 <http://icbc.com/> Image removed by sender. 2010 Olympic and Paralympic
Logo | ICBC Logo

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image003.jpg>>

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Reply via email to