I will be out of the office starting January 28th and will return on February 3rd.
>>> veritas-bu 01/28/11 12:25 >>> Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu You can reach the person managing the list at veritas-bu-ow...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Attempting to use two Data Domain systems with HP-UX (Joseph Despres) 2. Re: Attempting to use two Data Domain systems with HP-UX (Justin Piszcz) 3. Re: Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? (WALLEBROEK Bart) 4. Re: Need to Find the Media Passes (Saran Brar) 5. Re: RES: Bprestore Netbackup (Saran Brar) 6. test (Saran Brar) 7. Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server (Thomas, Nick) 8. Re: Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? (przemol...@poczta.fm) 9. Re: Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server (Saran Brar) 10. Re: Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? (ccosta....@gmail.com) 11. Re: Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? (Daniel Pum) 12. Re: Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? (Urs Krolzig) 13. Re: Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server (Thomas, Nick) 14. Re: Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server (Saran Brar) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:11:52 -0500 From: Joseph Despres <jdesp...@csc.com> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Attempting to use two Data Domain systems with HP-UX To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: <offd6c6320.cd25b30e-on05257825.0061919b-05257825.00697...@csc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hey All................. I'm attempting to use two Data Domain systems ........... Use them on the following systems ::---> Master = hpux 11.11, NBU 6.5.4 Media = hpux 11.11, NBU 6.5.4 They are NFS mounted on both systems.... I have setup 4 Storage Units... One from each DD units attached to each server... And from those Storage unit's I have created 1 Storage Groups...... When I kick off a test backup ... This is all I get in the detailed status ::---> Jan 27, 2011 2:08:25 PM - estimated 0 kbytes needed Jan 27, 2011 2:08:27 PM - started process bpbrm (pid=1182) Jan 27, 2011 2:08:27 PM - connecting Jan 27, 2011 2:08:28 PM - connected; connect time: 0:00:00 Any idea's? Thanks..... Joe Despres Backup Engineer CSC 3521 Ribcowski Ct Raleigh, NC 27616 GIS | (o): 1.919.266.1799 | (c): 1.919.931.9674 | jdesp...@csc.com | www.csc.com https://c3.csc.com/groups/netback This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110127/acb62d01/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:24:30 -0500 (EST) From: Justin Piszcz <jpis...@lucidpixels.com> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Attempting to use two Data Domain systems with HP-UX To: Joseph Despres <jdesp...@csc.com> Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: <alpine.deb.2.00.1101271424170.8...@p34.internal.lan> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Hi, What does the bpbrm log say? Can you write to the data domain NFS mounts as root? Justin. On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Joseph Despres wrote: > Hey All................. > > I'm attempting to use two Data Domain systems ........... > > Use them on the following systems ::---> > > Master = hpux 11.11, NBU 6.5.4 > Media = hpux 11.11, NBU 6.5.4 > > They are NFS mounted on both systems.... > > I have setup 4 Storage Units... One from each DD units attached to each > server... > > And from those Storage unit's I have created 1 Storage Groups...... > > When I kick off a test backup ... This is all I get in the detailed > status ::---> > > Jan 27, 2011 2:08:25 PM - estimated 0 kbytes needed > Jan 27, 2011 2:08:27 PM - started process bpbrm (pid=1182) > Jan 27, 2011 2:08:27 PM - connecting > Jan 27, 2011 2:08:28 PM - connected; connect time: 0:00:00 > > Any idea's? > > Thanks..... > > Joe Despres > Backup Engineer > CSC > > 3521 Ribcowski Ct Raleigh, NC 27616 > GIS | (o): 1.919.266.1799 | (c): 1.919.931.9674 | > jdesp...@csc.com | www.csc.com > https://c3.csc.com/groups/netback > > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in > delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to > bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit > written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of > e-mail for such purpose. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:28:38 +0100 From: WALLEBROEK Bart <bart.wallebr...@swift.com> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? To: "veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <457a0a8f6998fc47ba88352e340eea91b706650...@be-exchange-10.swift.corp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not supported when running Solaris on X66 ? We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC (zones). Best Regards, Bart WALLEBROEK Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist? Enterprise Applications Delivery -?Infrastructure Management S.W.I.F.T. SCRL Message: 4 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600 From: "James Yaple" <james.ya...@yahoo.com> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? To: <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <021e01cbbdb8$56e9dbf0$04bd93d0$@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers at $WORK. The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going to Solaris on x86. Is this a good idea? Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more or less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux? Thanks in advance, James ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:34:50 -0800 From: Saran Brar <saranb...@live.com> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Need to Find the Media Passes To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: <aanlktin36oet4wxzcfegmac+fo-yljvqrqof3cdzy...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" try nbemmcmd -listmedia -mediaid <mediaid> check the no. of mounts. hope this helps. On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:57 AM, NBU <netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com>wrote: > Hi Forum, > > I need to know how many time the media has been used....media passes. > > If anyone can help with any command/procedure to do so. > > > Thanks in Advance. > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------- > |This was sent by qureshiu...@rediffmail.com via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. > +---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110127/034ab448/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:54:07 -0800 From: Saran Brar <saranb...@live.com> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] RES: Bprestore Netbackup To: rodrigo.mo...@light.com.br Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: <AANLkTi=g8hvqq3j3pj_79joegb0oeigqgp-693sk6...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Did you hit ENTER key after putting last entry in the rename file. On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:31 AM, <rodrigo.mo...@light.com.br> wrote: > Riccardo, > > Try to -t 17 (SAP) > > bprestore -K -L /tmp/restore.log -C source -D destination -t 17 -s > 10/17/2010 07:00:00 -e 10/18/2010 06:30:00 -f /tmp/list > > Rodrigo Passos de Moura > Analista de Suporte > Service IT Solutions > 55 21 22114471 > 55 51 33146000 > RS-PR-SP-RJ-ARG > www.service.com.br > > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto: > veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] Em nome de riccardo1981 > Enviada em: sexta-feira, 21 de janeiro de 2011 13:16 > Para: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU > Assunto: [Veritas-bu] Bprestore Netbackup > > Hi Everybody, > > I have this problem. I trying to restore some file using bprestore CLI > command line > > The sintax is the follow: > > bprestore -B -L c:\temp\log1.txt -C source_server -D destination server -s > 01/01/2008 -e 12/31/2010 -R C:\temp\pippo.txt -f C:\temp\topolino.txt > > where pippo.txt is: > change /BDAREA_BCK/ARCHIVIO/ to /C/temp/CRSTD_BD/ > > and topolino.txt is: > > /BDAREA_BCK/ARCHIVIO/UDBDAD01.XBD.CSRTFID200810.DEL > /BDAREA_BCK/ARCHIVIO/UDBDAD01.XBD.CSRTFID200908.DDL > /BDAREA_BCK/ARCHIVIO/UDBDAD01.XBD.CSRTFID200909.DEL > > The result is > in the GUI : Exit Status: 227 (no entity was found) > in dos-shell is: > Invalid line length in line: > EXIT STATUS 144: invalid command usage > > Source server is an AIX machine , destination server is a windows machine. > I used the upper case for the driver letter ( for windows system) > If I try to restore only a single file ( for example XXX810.DEL ) the > restore works fine. The problem occured when I use the -f option. > So where is the problem ? > > Thanks in advance > Riccardo > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------- > |This was sent by riccardo1...@yahoo.it via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. > +---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110127/6ad83d4d/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:20:31 -0800 From: Saran Brar <saranb...@live.com> Subject: [Veritas-bu] test To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: <AANLkTi=sfjg8-wfnyg5flrv-b2a0tmm4+qo5n7703...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" test -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110127/a0e4a04f/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:30:45 +0000 From: "Thomas, Nick" <nick.tho...@icbc.com> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server To: "'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <8f42c84847dcdc4db57041ede4fb59973142d...@ex02mx299.icbc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Good evening all, We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error only when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box individually but not the Dag. We have even patched the client to 7.0.1. Anyone else out there seeing this? ------------------------------------------------------------ This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this email immediately. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110128/aabe921a/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:08:09 +0100 From: przemol...@poczta.fm Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: <20110128100809.ga5...@host.pgf.com.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ? Is there any document about it ? Regards Przemek On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote: > Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not supported when running Solaris on X66 ? > We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC (zones). > > Best Regards, > Bart WALLEBROEK > Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist? > Enterprise Applications Delivery -?Infrastructure Management > S.W.I.F.T. SCRL > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600 > From: "James Yaple" <james.ya...@yahoo.com> > Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? > To: <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> > Message-ID: <021e01cbbdb8$56e9dbf0$04bd93d0$@yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers at > $WORK. > > The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going to > Solaris on x86. > > Is this a good idea? Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more or > less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux? > > Thanks in advance, > > James > > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ---------------------------------------------------------------- Auta nowe i u??ywane, du??e i ma??e - najwi??ksza baza! Sprawd?? >> http://linkint.pl/f28df ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:15:26 +0530 From: Saran Brar <saranb...@live.com> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server To: "Thomas, Nick" <nick.tho...@icbc.com> Cc: "veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <AANLkTimiPw=xox3lpyry6wcf_urowtnsj53xmy93j...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" What error code are you getting. Is it 59? If yes, did you check host and registry entries for the master/media servers. On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Thomas, Nick <nick.tho...@icbc.com> wrote: > Good evening all, > > > > We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640 > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error > only when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box > individually but not the Dag. We have even patched the client to 7.0.1. > Anyone else out there seeing this? > > ------------------------------ > * > This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient > and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized > copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named > recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error > or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all > copies of this email immediately. > * > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110128/a54bbc0c/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:08:27 +0000 From: ccosta....@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? To: przemol...@poczta.fm,veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: <1887492926-1296216421-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-9579695...@bda529.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Vmware Off-host backup capabilities are only supported on Windows OS. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -----Original Message----- From: przemol...@poczta.fm Sender: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:08:09 To: <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Reply-To: przemol...@poczta.fm Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ? Is there any document about it ? Regards Przemek On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote: > Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not supported when running Solaris on X66 ? > We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC (zones). > > Best Regards, > Bart WALLEBROEK > Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist? > Enterprise Applications Delivery -?Infrastructure Management > S.W.I.F.T. SCRL > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600 > From: "James Yaple" <james.ya...@yahoo.com> > Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? > To: <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> > Message-ID: <021e01cbbdb8$56e9dbf0$04bd93d0$@yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers at > $WORK. > > The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going to > Solaris on x86. > > Is this a good idea? Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more or > less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux? > > Thanks in advance, > > James > >_______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ---------------------------------------------------------------- Auta nowe i u??ywane, du??e i ma??e - najwi??ksza baza! Sprawd?? >> http://linkint.pl/f28df _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:46:47 -0600 From: Daniel Pum <d...@datalink.com> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? To: "veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <93ec9bddb6733c47885a6554ef3674763d59e...@some.datalink.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" The big one is that there is no dedup support - for either media server dedup or the PDDO plugin. Appliances that use NFS or FC VTL do work. OST plugin support from the manufacturers varies - for example, Data Domain does not have a Solaris x86 plugin but Quantum does. Another big one is that there is no Granular Recovery Technology support for Active Directory, Exchange, and SharePoint. I've never seen one document that mentions all this, so if someone has it and can share, I think we'd all appreciate it. -daniel -----Original Message----- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of przemol...@poczta.fm Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:08 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ? Is there any document about it ? Regards Przemek On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote: > Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not supported when running Solaris on X66 ? > We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC (zones). > > Best Regards, > Bart WALLEBROEK > Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist? > Enterprise Applications Delivery -?Infrastructure Management > S.W.I.F.T. SCRL > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600 > From: "James Yaple" <james.ya...@yahoo.com> > Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? > To: <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> > Message-ID: <021e01cbbdb8$56e9dbf0$04bd93d0$@yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers at > $WORK. > > The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going to > Solaris on x86. > > Is this a good idea? Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more or > less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux? > > Thanks in advance, > > James > > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ---------------------------------------------------------------- Auta nowe i u??ywane, du??e i ma??e - najwi??ksza baza! Sprawd?? >> http://linkint.pl/f28df _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:50:44 +0100 From: "Urs Krolzig" <urs.krol...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? To: "Daniel Pum" <d...@datalink.com>, <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <A6845CEBBB4C4848A1896703DFF9C2B6@screamer000> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-2"; reply-type=original Hello Since PD 6.6.1 there is support for PDDO on Solaris x86_64 Check the compatibility list http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH139108 Also in the release notes you cand find this Solaris 10 x64 OST Plug-in Can be found here http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH137146 Urs ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Pum" <d...@datalink.com> To: <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:46 PM Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? The big one is that there is no dedup support - for either media server dedup or the PDDO plugin. Appliances that use NFS or FC VTL do work. OST plugin support from the manufacturers varies - for example, Data Domain does not have a Solaris x86 plugin but Quantum does. Another big one is that there is no Granular Recovery Technology support for Active Directory, Exchange, and SharePoint. I've never seen one document that mentions all this, so if someone has it and can share, I think we'd all appreciate it. -daniel -----Original Message----- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of przemol...@poczta.fm Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:08 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ? Is there any document about it ? Regards Przemek On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote: > Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not supported > when running Solaris on X66 ? > We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC > (zones). > > Best Regards, > Bart WALLEBROEK > Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist > Enterprise Applications Delivery - Infrastructure Management > S.W.I.F.T. SCRL > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600 > From: "James Yaple" <james.ya...@yahoo.com> > Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86? > To: <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> > Message-ID: <021e01cbbdb8$56e9dbf0$04bd93d0$@yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers at > $WORK. > > The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going to > Solaris on x86. > > Is this a good idea? Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more or > less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux? > > Thanks in advance, > > James > > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ---------------------------------------------------------------- Auta nowe i u??ywane, du??e i ma??e - najwi??ksza baza! Sprawd?? >> http://linkint.pl/f28df _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:06:06 +0000 From: "Thomas, Nick" <nick.tho...@icbc.com> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server To: 'Saran Brar' <saranb...@live.com> Cc: "'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <8f42c84847dcdc4db57041ede4fb59973142d...@ex02mx299.icbc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I am getting a 26 client server hand shaking failed. From: saranji...@gmail.com [mailto:saranji...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Saran Brar Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:45 AM To: Thomas, Nick Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server What error code are you getting. Is it 59? If yes, did you check host and registry entries for the master/media servers. On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Thomas, Nick <nick.tho...@icbc.com<mailto:nick.tho...@icbc.com>> wrote: Good evening all, We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error only when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box individually but not the Dag. We have even patched the client to 7.0.1. Anyone else out there seeing this? ________________________________ This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this email immediately. _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu<mailto:Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ------------------------------------------------------------ This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this email immediately. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110128/a6546ade/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:25:26 -0800 From: Saran Brar <saranb...@live.com> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server To: "Thomas, Nick" <nick.tho...@icbc.com> Cc: "veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <AANLkTim9N5iXLRX5=O1tP0=-Znung=itexn+opsds...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Below link looks closer to your issue. Try it http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH125427 On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Thomas, Nick <nick.tho...@icbc.com> wrote: > I am getting a 26 client server hand shaking failed. > > > > *From:* saranji...@gmail.com [mailto:saranji...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Saran > Brar > *Sent:* Friday, January 28, 2011 2:45 AM > *To:* Thomas, Nick > *Cc:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange > 2010 dag server > > > > What error code are you getting. Is it 59? If yes, did you check host and > registry entries for the master/media servers. > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Thomas, Nick <nick.tho...@icbc.com> > wrote: > > Good evening all, > > > > We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640 > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error > only when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box > individually but not the Dag. We have even patched the client to 7.0.1. > Anyone else out there seeing this? > ------------------------------ > > *This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient > and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized > copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named > recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error > or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all > copies of this email immediately.* > > > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > > > > ------------------------------ > * > This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient > and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized > copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named > recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error > or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all > copies of this email immediately. > * > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110128/4807f2c0/attachment.htm ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 57, Issue 7 ***************************************** _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu