On the Quantum, When we were looking at it a while back, I understood that for each client you threw at it, it would store a non-deduped initial "base" image of that client and dedupe around it, as opposed to deduping everything including base images and incrementals.
Is that still the case? ~ Robin From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Lightner, Jeff Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 6:03 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Quantum's DXi Series of Dedupe Appliances We have run the DD460 and DD690 (and continue to run the latter). Back in November we got the DXi 6500 to replace our two DD460s. Performance wise I really like the Data Domain products - they do the compression they promise. So far I've seen nothing with the DXi 6500 that leads me to believe it isn't just as good. We use it for our main Production (4 TB) DB and other large backups. The PROD backup is finishing in a window shorter than it did on the DD690. We went to the Quantum stuff as part of a big data center move that gave us better pricing for the DXi than we would have gotten on a DD not for any technical issues with the DD itself.
_______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
