I had him recreate the reverse lookup pointers for the machines that had the vnet_cache issue. The ssh connection to these machines also seemed to benefit from the reverse lookup
Regards Michael Den 04/09/2012 kl. 19.45 skrev William Brown <william.d.br...@gsk.com>: > Interested to know what you did when " DNS administrator removed the reverse > lookup zones ". > > Did you ask them to reinstate the reverse lookup, or reconfigure NetBackup to > no longer require it, or what? I ask because occasionally we have > discussions about this, and have a few environments without reverse lookup - > as they are non-production we use hosts files, but I just wonder what 'most' > people do. > > William D L Brown > > -----Original Message----- > From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Graff > Andersen > Sent: 04 September 2012 13:55 > To: Justin Piszcz > Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.3: bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo() > for x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2) > > Hello Justin > > I have seen the same thing on Netbackup 7.1.0.2 after our DNS administrator > removed the reverse lookup zones > > Took a day or two after the change before the vnet entries appeared in the > problems log. > > I would try to run bpclntcmd -clear_host_cache first > > Regards > Michael > > 2012/9/4 Justin Piszcz <jpis...@lucidpixels.com>: >> Hello, >> >> Upgraded from 7.1 to 7.5.0.3 (7.1->7.5->7.5.0.3). >> >> During a regular hot catalog backup I saw this: >> 1346454000 1 2 16 master 0 0 0 *NULL* bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo() >> for x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2) >> 1346540401 1 2 16 master 0 0 0 *NULL* bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo() >> for x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2) >> >> Everything had been running for several days without a single problem, >> this happened recently, also the test environment running for 5-6+ >> months has never had this problem. >> >> I opened a case with Symantec but was curious if anyone had seen this before? >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Justin. >> _______________________________________________ >> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu >> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > > > ________________________________ > > This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited > (registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a > member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The > registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited > is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS. > > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
