Daniel, Do you have experience with the EMC hardware?
Dwayne DWAYN --- Original Message --- From: "Daniel Jimenez" <sta...@hotmail.com> Sent: September 14, 2013 10:31 PM To: "Tom Moore" <thomas.mo...@cox.net>, veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu, "Dwayne Adams" <dc_adam...@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 89, Issue 12 EMCs strategy is NDMP through an NDMP accelerator node that has an initial full and then only sends the changes thereafter but each backup is considered a full. Daniel Sent from Windows Mail From: Dwayne Adams Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:12 PM To: Tom Moore, veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Tom, Thanks. Interesting. That is a horrible way to backup volumes. That was the solution before NDMP. CommVault suggested the same thing. EMC has a hardware solution that they say gets good Dedupe rates with inline NDMP stream backups with an incremental forever strategy. I wanted to see if the Netbackup Accelerator offers similar features. Dwayne --- Original Message --- From: "Tom Moore" <thomas.mo...@cox.net> Sent: September 14, 2013 11:24 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 89, Issue 12 Per conversations with engineering, ndmp does not dedupe well. It was suggested that we mount the volumes to a media server and run it to a dedupe pool. Ymmv Cheers, On Sep 14, 2013, at 10:00 AM, veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu wrote: > Netbackup NDMP Dedupe _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
