Hi Guys
 
Thanks for all the advise last night. 
 
We found the problem - I still don't understand exactly how it's
related, but IPMP was config'ed incorrectly. Once my colleagues fixed
it, had and gab were 'happy'!
 
This what ifconfig looked like yesterday:
 
# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=1000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 8232 index 1
        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
bge0:
flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER>
mtu 1500 index 2
        inet 10.113.124.12 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.113.124.255
        groupname drp-db
        ether 0:14:4f:a3:81:e4
bge0:1:
flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER>
mtu 1500 index 2
        inet 10.113.124.102 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.113.124.255
bge3:
flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER>
mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 10.113.124.112 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.113.124.255
        groupname drp-db
        ether 0:14:4f:a3:81:e7
 
 
After today's changes:
 
 # ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=1000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 8232 index 1
        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
bge3:
flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER>
mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 10.113.124.112 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.113.124.255
        groupname drp-db
        ether 0:14:4f:a3:81:e7
bge0:
flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER>
mtu 1500 index 4
        inet 10.113.124.102 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.113.124.255
        groupname drp-db
        ether 0:14:4f:a3:81:e4
bge0:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500
index 4
        inet 10.113.124.12 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.113.124.255

 

Marianne 


________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marianne
Van Den Berg
Sent: 13 November 2007 22:42
To: Jim Senicka; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] SF/HA 5.0 on Solaris 9: "HAD Self Check" error


Brand new systems: 
Sun Fire V245 Servers, 

2 Ultra Sparc IIIi 1.5Ghz CPU, 

2Gb DDR-1 SDRAM 
 
Only O/S and SF/HA loaded. I recently presented vcs 5.0 training in
Israel on little single-cpu blades with 1Gb memory, clustering 2 Oracle
instances. It was dog slow but no errors.... Only difference was using
5.0 - no patches.
 
Maybe time to log a support call - I simply don't have the energy.... My
experience with Symantec Support is getting progressively more
disappointing/frustrating.
 
 
Was hoping somebody on the list has seen the same problem and could
point me in the right direction.
 
Kind regards

Marianne 


________________________________

From: Jim Senicka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 13 November 2007 20:36
To: Marianne Van Den Berg; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-ha] SF/HA 5.0 on Solaris 9: "HAD Self Check" error


HAD is not talking to GAB.
Excessive system utilization, or a blocked /var file system or some such
issue.
 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marianne
Van Den Berg
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:17 PM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] SF/HA 5.0 on Solaris 9: "HAD Self Check" error


Hi all
 
Brand new installation - 2-node cluster, Solaris 9 with latest O/S
patches, SF/HA 5.0 with MP1.
 
IPMultiNICB config'ed as parallel sg (using mpathd) and ClusterService
group.
 
Getting these errors about 3 minutes after hastart.   Any ideas??
 
/var/adm/messages:
 
Nov 13 15:59:11 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 272231 kern.notice] GAB WARNING
V-15-1-20057 Port h process 140 inactive 7 sec
Nov 13 15:59:12 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 272231 kern.notice] GAB WARNING
V-15-1-20057 Port h process 140 inactive 8 sec
Nov 13 15:59:13 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 272231 kern.notice] GAB WARNING
V-15-1-20057 Port h process 140 inactive 9 sec
Nov 13 15:59:14 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 272231 kern.notice] GAB WARNING
V-15-1-20057 Port h process 140 inactive 10 sec
Nov 13 15:59:15 drp-db-1 Had[140]: [ID 702911 daemon.alert] VCS WARNING
V-16-1-51047 HAD Self Check: Excessive delay in the HAD heartbeat to GAB
(10 seconds)
Nov 13 15:59:15 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 272231 kern.notice] GAB WARNING
V-15-1-20057 Port h process 140 inactive 11 sec
Nov 13 15:59:16 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 272231 kern.notice] GAB WARNING
V-15-1-20057 Port h process 140 inactive 12 sec
Nov 13 15:59:17 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 272231 kern.notice] GAB WARNING
V-15-1-20057 Port h process 140 inactive 13 sec
Nov 13 15:59:18 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 272231 kern.notice] GAB WARNING
V-15-1-20057 Port h process 140 inactive 14 sec
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 191522 kern.notice] GAB WARNING
V-15-1-20058 Port h process 140: heartbeat failed, killing process
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 975177 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20059 Port h heartbeat interval 15000 msec. Statistics:
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 217350 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20129 Port h: heartbeats in 0 ~ 3000 msec: 3869
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 217350 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20129 Port h: heartbeats in 3000 ~ 6000 msec: 0
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 217350 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20129 Port h: heartbeats in 6000 ~ 9000 msec: 0
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 217350 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20129 Port h: heartbeats in 9000 ~ 12000 msec: 0
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 217350 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20129 Port h: heartbeats in 12000 ~ 15000 msec: 0
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 259915 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20094     number of processes:           158
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 631272 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20095     load average in 1 min:         0. 6
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 587815 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20096     load average in 5 min:         0. 8
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 980060 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20097     load average in 15 min:        0.10
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 559196 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20098     pagein rate:                   0
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 582491 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20099     pageout rate:                  0
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 940236 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20041 Port h: client process failure: killing process
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 Had[140]: [ID 702911 daemon.alert] VCS WARNING
V-16-1-53034 HAD Signal SIGABRT received
Nov 13 15:59:19 drp-db-1 Had[140]: [ID 702911 daemon.alert] VCS NOTICE
V-16-1-53038 Beginning execution of the diagnostics script
Nov 13 15:59:21 drp-db-1 Had[140]: [ID 702911 daemon.alert] VCS NOTICE
V-16-1-53039 Completed execution of the diagnostics script
Nov 13 15:59:22 drp-db-1 gab: [ID 397130 kern.notice] GAB INFO
V-15-1-20032 Port h closed
Nov 13 15:59:22 drp-db-1 syslog[29181]: [ID 702911 daemon.notice] VCS
ERROR V-16-1-11103 VCS exited. It will restart
 
 
 
had restarts, but the same thing happens again after a couple of
minutes.
 
Regards
 
Marianne
 
_______________________________________________
Veritas-ha maillist  -  Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha

Reply via email to