Hi guys, As the author of the license agreement, please let me clear up the intent of these limitations.
Here's the relevant text from the EULA: "The Commercial License and NFR License both do not allow Versions to be activated and used on more computers than the number of computers you have obtained said License(s) for. Sofa may, at its sole discretion, for your convenience decide to allow you to activate Versions on additional computers within reasonable limits. Notwithstanding such a decision you are only licensed to use Versions simultaneously on the amount of computers you have obtained said License(s) for." As usual with these kinds of agreements, the language is a bit harsher than the intent. Emphasis should be on "Sofa may, at its sole discretion, for your convenience decide to allow you to activate Versions on additional computers within reasonable limits.". Well, decision made :) As long as you don't use Versions simultaneously on multiple machines, we're absolutely cool if you use the same license code on several machines as long as those are all machines belonging or primarily used by the same person. Our assumption was that people would try to use the same license code on several of their personal machines anyway, the language in the license agreement is there so there can be no doubt that we have the right to block license codes that are being (ab)used excessively. Please drop me a line, or follow-up here, if you have further questions about the EULA. Thanks :) - Dirk Stoop Sofa / Versions On Nov 17, 5:44 pm, Hugues Lismonde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Same here... If I have to shell out 39€ per machine, I'd rather buy > Cornerstone at 54€, more features and up to 2 computers (not perfect > but much better). > > Hugues > On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:37, Jeff wrote: > > > > > I absolutely agree. I rotate between 2 machines, only working on > > one at a time. I'll purchase one license for myself, for my laptop, > > but I refuse to purchase a second license for the two or three times > > a week I need to use my desktop machine. > > > This is disappointing. I was expecting to purchase multiple user > > licenses for my company when Versions was released. Instead, > > I'm going to recommend that we standardize on a different > > package instead. I can't justify 2-3x the cost per developer. > > > Best of luck, it's a great product - but understand that you're going > > to lose a lot of potential licenses by trying to force people to > > but multiple licenses. > > > Jeff --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
