I agree with Chris; an external merge/diff tool is a far better idea than trying to duplicate this functionality within Versions; if it was provided as part of the client then it'd be fair to expect the software to cost more, since a merge/diff tool is a nontrivial piece of functionality.
What we *could* however do with is better workflow for inspecting each set of changes inside of a changeset you're about to commit. Currently you have to manually select each file in the 'Changed' view and then the toolbar; at the very least it should be possible to do this with each item inside of the commit dialog, but what would be even better is if you could tie this into some sort of 'Review' system. Where I work, most code changes undergo peer review before being checked in. For users on Windows this is easily done from the commit dialog within TortoiseSVN, but Versions lacks this functionality. If you could open the changes from the commit list, and perhaps even have a simple 'reviewed' tickbox that automatically ticks after each one has been viewed in the external diff tool, then Versions would have a distinct advantage over the leading Windows SVN client. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
