I agree, I don't see a reason for supporting interlace in future video codecs. On 7 Jul 2015 21:29, "Timothy B. Terriberry" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thomas Daede wrote: > >> Arguments against interlacing: >> - Requires extra features to encode efficiently. HEVC has dropped MBAFF, >> libvpx has never supported interlacing. >> - Moves deinterlacer complexity to the encoder, which is an easier place >> to offload complexity >> - There are no internet-connected interlaced displays in common usage >> > > I'll add one more: brings into play a large amount of additional IPR to > avoid. > > _______________________________________________ > video-codec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec >
_______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
