>If you are basing this assessment on the requirements draft, then note that >the requirements draft is a work in progress and is not complete. >Streaming use cases should be added there, and I'm quite surprised I managed >to leave it out of the first draft. Agreed
-----Original Message----- From: metaj...@gmail.com [mailto:metaj...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jack Moffitt Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:45 PM To: Filippov Alexey Cc: Ali C. Begen (abegen); video-codec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [video-codec] draft-filippov-netvc-requirements-01 > Then, it would be hard to explain why Opus is used by YouTube, and > NETVC codec is currently not even targeted at it. If you are basing this assessment on the requirements draft, then note that the requirements draft is a work in progress and is not complete. Streaming use cases should be added there, and I'm quite surprised I managed to leave it out of the first draft. jack. _______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list video-codec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
